Notation and model for correlations
The pulse pair processing mode is used for all polarization calculations, except that Zdr-only processing for the STAR case can be done in either FFT or random phase as well as pulse pair.
As with the standard moments, autocorrelations form the basis for the processing of the polarization variables.
An autocorrelation is the
cross-correlation of a signal with itself. Informally, it is the similarity between
observations as a function of the time separation between them. It is a mathematical
tool for finding repeating patterns, such as the presence of a periodic signal, which
has been buried under noise. However, it is also possible to perform a correlation of
the Shh and Svv signal, which is
used to create ZHV.
The autocorrelations are computed similarly to the standard moments. For example, in pulse pair mode the autocorrelations for the horizontal transmit co-polar channel are:
For dual polarization systems, these correlations can be applied up to 4 different ways (Rhh, Rvv, Rhv, and Rvh), where Rhv and Rvh are equivalent. The physical model for the channel powers is identical to the model used for the standard moment cases:
Co-channel power
Diagonal channel power
Here S denotes the
actual backscatter average power to the radar. When multiplied by the appropriate
transmitter and receiver gains, S yields the actual measured power.
Sometimes in comparing powers in 2 channels (for example, Zdr and LDR),
we need to know the relative gains of the 2 channels. However, in many calculations,
the relative gains cancel out, and in these cases the algorithms are implemented
assuming all the gains are equal to 1.
In the Rhv
term, the noise variable is not present because the noise between the horizontal
receiver and vertical receiver is random, having a normalized coherency of 0 with an
infinite number of samples. A finite number of samples needs to be used, typically
between 30 ... 60, in weather radar signal processing. However, due to the noise
coherency going to 0, the noise variance also becomes smaller, allowing us to lower
the detection thresholds, while having same false alarm rates as the traditional
Rhh term. Lowering the detection threshold
increases the apparent sensitivity when inserting the
Rhv term in the radar equation for reflectivity.
In the following algorithm descriptions, we use the notation common in the literature, for example:
